|
Behind
The Numbers (May 2007, CA Magazine)
By John Lorinc
 |
For
those who would prefer to see the version at the CA Magazine
website, please click on the image
(left) to go directly to the article.
Otherwise,
it is reproduced word-for-word below:
|
How do small and
medium-sized firms organize their practices?
(Quotes form
Steve McIntyre-Smith in Bold)
 |
Once
in a while, Peter Yaremchuk, an Edmonton practitioner
and president of the Institute of Chartered Accountants
of Alberta, needs to get a read on how other small firms
in his city are doing. Not surprisingly, some of the partners
running Edmonton’s smaller accounting firms also
find themselves craving that kind of feedback from their
colleagues.
For
that reason, Yaremchuk, co-founder of Yaremchuk &
Annicchiarico LLP, a five-partner firm, gets together
with members of nine other firms every few months or so
to chat informally about staffing issues, market conditions,
clients, standards and anything else that has crossed
their professional radar screens.
On
the other side of the country, Susan McIsaac, who runs
a two-person partnership based in Amherst, NS, does much
the same sort of thing, although her professional network
is rural and more dispersed across Atlantic Canada. |
Through
the AC Group, a network of accountants in Atlantic Canada, McIsaac
and other independent accounting firms conduct regional surveys
on practice concerns such as wage levels. Like all professionals,
accountants have a need for self-appraisal done in a systematic
way. For small and medium-sized firms, it’s a tough challenge,
and this is where the CA profession’s three-part Managing
a Public Practice Survey (MAPP) proves invaluable. The survey
— set in motion by the profession’s Member Relations
Task Force — provides a snapshot of how small and medium-sized
firms organize their practices across Canada. The first part
of the MAPP survey — “Billing rates, compensation
and benefits” — was summarized in the December 2006
issue. Some of the findings of the second and third parts —
“Computerization” and “Practice management”
— are summarized below.
The “Practice
management” part of the survey offered for the first time
a national snapshot of the business environment for small and
medium-sized firms coast to coast. Not surprisingly, there are
significant regional variations, as well as distinct changes
in the sort of work firms de-pend on, based on the size of the
partner-ship (see “Summary fee analysis by firm size”
above).

The leading
types of engagements overall are, in order: assurance, notice
to readers/compilations and tax preparation.
Assurance
formed a larger component of fees once the firm size exceeded
five full-time equivalents [FTEs], while compilations comprised
a significant proportion of the services (either the largest
or second-largest category) until the firm size exceeded 35
FTEs.
Review
engagements accounted for a larger percentage of gross fees
in Atlantic Canada and Quebec than the norm (which is 18% of
gross fees).
Compilations accounted for a larger percentage of gross fees
in Western Canada (BC and Alberta) than the norm (28%) and accounted
for a smaller percentage of fees in Quebec.
Personal
income tax services accounted for a lower percentage of gross
fees in Manitoba than other provinces.
Ian McConnan, partner in Harris McConnan LLP in Edmonton, says
his firm mainly handles notice to readers/compilation reviews
and tax returns but also does a lot of work in the not-for-profit
sector. “Just about every not-for-profit is a loss situation
for us,” he says. “But that’s public service
work and part of our philosophy is that somebody’s got
to do it.”
John Tabone,
CICA’s manager of inovation, says he was surprised to
see that services other than auditing, accounting and tax continue
to represent a relatively small share of firm revenues. The
survey found that assurance and related services comprise almost
three-fifths of billings. “I suspect this might decline
as some firms drop assurance altogether to focus on other services.”
Financial
planning is one example. The survey found that, on average,
less than 1% of fees came from this kind of work. But Brian
Purdy, CFP, partner in PMT Chartered Accountants and Business
Advisors in Williams Lake, BC, says demand for this kind of
service has been mounting in recent years as the number of retirees
in this town of 20,000 has shot up. “Financial planning
is a growing area for us, but it’s still part of the general
practice.”
In Purdy’s
case, that means 1,600 tax returns each year. Tabone points
out the survey clearly indicates just how important private
owner-managed businesses are for small accounting firms. “Accounting
for 67% of revenues, they are the lifeblood of many CA firms.”
As Yaremchuk says, his firm thrives on owner-operated companies
in the $1-million to $2-million revenue range. “They are
easy to deal with and they’re there for a long time.”
Tabone
points out even among firms with more than 35 FTEs, listed companies
represent only a 7% share of revenues (see “Fees earned
by sector” on page 35). While the lion’s share of
publicly traded corporations use the Big Four, smaller but well-established
CA firms in Vancouver, Montreal and Kitchener-Waterloo, Ont.,
have been able to sign up public company clients, in some cases
because there’s such a mismatch between supply and demand.
Yaremchuk notes that about a quarter of his firm’s billings
come from the construction industry.
That kind
of specialization turns out to be relatively rare, even though
some practice management experts advise accounting firms to
be much more selective and strategic about their mix of clients.
The survey concluded that for only 11% of the respondents, more
than half their revenues come from one industry, and most focus
on several sectors. Quebec had the highest proportion of respondents
— 33% — that specialized so heavily in one industry.
While
putting all your eggs in one sectoral basket may be too risky
for many firms, Steve McIntyre-Smith tells his clients to focus
on a handful of industries as a means of building a practice
that distinguishes itself from the pack.
McIntyre-Smith
is president of Oakville, Ont.-based MFA Group Inc., which specializes
in accounting practices. “A lot of small firms take any
business on and they grow the practice by default instead of
by design.” He advises CAs to ask themselves what industry
they would have gone into had they not become accountants, as
a way of focusing on a sector that excites them. Then it is
a matter of linking up with industry associations, attending
conferences and reading the trade press.
This is
the strategy McIsaac took when she took over a national firm’s
local office in 1999. She decided to stay away from municipalities
— “the learning curve was too great” —
and has a large agricultural client base. People in her office
grew up in farming communities and McIsaac has a post-secondary
degree from an agricultural college. The result: her staff has
grown to 14 from 5 and in the past year,she opened a second
office and added an-other partner.
One of
the most interesting measures in the survey had to do with partner
in-come. “Sole practitioners are not necessarily in practice
to be rich,” says Ingrid Enhagen, associate director in
member services for the Institute of Chartered Accountants of
Ontario and one of the authors of the MAPP survey. According
to the data collected, a sole practitioner’s average net
in-come was about $71,000, less than half the average for partners
across all the sizes of firms responding. In firms with more
than 35 FTEs, the average net income rose to $305,000. Other
key findings:
The largest
net income amounts were in Alberta, British Columbia and Ontario
(ranging between $181,000 and $189,000).
Firms
anticipated an 8% increase in the firm’s annual net income
before partner compensation over the next 12 months, with the
biggest increases anticipated in Alberta (12%). As for overall
operating expenses, the survey found that the average profit
mar-gin before partner distributions was about 44%. Firms are
able to recover 93¢ of each billed dollar, and most tend
not to ask their clients for deposits and retainers. Stella
Leung, a professional standards adviser for the Institute of
Chartered Accountants of British Columbia, and a CA who participated
in the development and reporting of the survey, also points
out that many of the firms surveyed were not spending as much
time as expected promoting themselves.
Not surprisingly,
salaries represented the largest expense item, accounting for
about 28% of gross billings. And, for a small firm in a rural
area, staff cannot have the same expectations as those in firms
in the cities. “If I had to pay the average wage in the
survey,” McIsaac says, “I couldn’t recover
it.” In Edmonton, meanwhile, McConnan has the opposite
problem: these days, he is having to boost salaries by 25% to
30% a year just to keep up with Alberta’s red hot job
market. “It’s nuts. I’m updating my salaries
every three to six months just to keep up.” It is a classic
seller’s market: employers outnumber commerce students
by two to one at university job fairs. “Everybody’s
short of staff.”
The
related issue is recruiting young CAs to join small practices,
especially those away from urban centers. McIntyre-Smith lays
out the recruiting squeeze in demographic terms: the baby boomers
are beginning to retire, while their children, now entering
the workforce, are not clamouring to join the accounting profession.
Enhagen says that firms need to plan for the future more actively.
“Less than 30% of the firms responding (including sole
practitioners) have a succession plan or practice continuation
plan in place.” And, she adds, “There are still
a significant number of partnerships [25%] that do not have
a partnership agreement in place.”
The
advice McIntyre-Smith gives his accounting firm clients is that
they need to differentiate themselves — perhaps by specializing
in certain sectors or service areas, or offering work/life balance
policies, such as allowing accountants to work from home. That
observation meshes with one of the most telling findings of
the MAPP survey — an overview of the top issues facing
firms. Topping the list: keeping current with the rapidly changing
technical environment; retaining high-quality clients; balancing
work and personal life priorities, and recruiting talented staff
(see “Top issues facing firms” on page 36).

The part
on “Computerization” found respondents spent an
average of $40,000, or 4% of revenues, on technology purchases,
with smaller firms replacing computers on an as-needed basis
and larger practices (i.e., with more than 35 FTEs) updating
their computers on a regular two- to five-year cycle. CA firms
clearly favoured desktop models over laptops, with 63% using
desktops exclusively. Among larger firms, however,the proportion
of CAs using laptops is exactly the same as those using desktops.
One of
the reasons is computer theft. This kind of crime “may
be more prevalent than practitioners are aware of,” says
Enhagen. She points out that 18% of respondents had experienced
computer theft, and it seems to be more prevalent in larger
practices. What’s more, the technology investments often
do not include security systems. “The lack of security
in the CA firms surveyed is rather disconcerting,” adds
Tabone. “Few firms use any kind of security when exchanging
confidential information over the Internet and those that do
are not using the best security practice — they use passwords
without encryption.”

Many small
firms have also been slow to establish an online presence. About
70%of surveyed firms with fewer than 10 FTEs did not maintain
a website (and only 60%of those that did reported being satisfied
or very satisfied with their site). Tabone calls the low level
of interest in websites surprising. But in some firms, partners
prefer not to have an Internet presence for fear it will attract
the wrong sort of clients. “You end up with the clients
you don’t want,” says McConnan, referring to clients
who do not pay promptly or think accountants exist to help them
defraud the government.
McIntyre-Smith
asserts that no one should expect websites to generate new business.
But, he adds, when articling students are vetting potential
employers, they will often follow up an initial contact with
some Internet research. If they cannot find any online information,
“the firm is showing it is behind the times.” Prospective
clients may do online research on a firm as well. McIntyre-Smith
also says it’s worth the effort to spend a bit of money
to create a distinctive online profile rather than rely on the
widely available boilerplate website templates.
Though
many small firms do not have their own website, the survey found
that Internet use is ubiquitous in the industry, especially
for research. Two-thirds of respondents visited the Canada Revenue
Agency website at least once a week(please see table below).
Keeping
current with office technology can be a bit trickier, especially
in very small firms where the chief technology officer is also
the managing partner. “If the top people running the firm
aren’t willing to spend the time thinking about technology,
it’s just not going to happen,” says Ken Gelhorn,
who runs Gelhorn Information Systems, a Richmond, BC- based
IT consulting outfit specializing in accounting firms.

Office
technology can soak up a lot of attention. The survey found
that more than half the respondents had endured viruses, and
almost one in five has experienced computer theft.
McIsaac’s
story is not atypical. After reviewing the technology survey
results, she concluded that her firm is in the middle of the
technology road. She has been moving toward creating a paperless
office by adopting software systems that can scan and copy documents,
allow users to update pdf files and so on. But she ran into
problems trying to create an internal network between her firm’s
two offices and hadn’t found enough of a clearing in her
schedule to solve the problem. “Time was the biggest constraint,”
she says. But she has made some progress, saying the problem
“is getting resolved.”
The results
suggest small firms remain skeptical about the move to paperless
office systems. “We get a little bit concerned”
about not having the paper back-up files, says McConnan, who
arrived at work one Monday to discover that a weekend computer
meltdown had obliterated several files. “We keep paper
files forever.”
Gelhorn
adds that many smaller ac-counting firms could afford to be
much more strategic in their technology practices. He recommends
that a basic complement of equipment include 300 gigabyte back-up
hard drives that can be stored off site as a means of providing
the back-up copies of all client files. Scanners, too, are essential
equipment because they allow staff an easy means of accessing
documents. The adoption rate is going up: in 2005, he says,
about a quarter of his clients had one in their office; last
year, it was up to 50%. (This year the number will probably
exceed 50%.)Yet in his view, the single most important technology
outlay is dual monitors, a configuration he recommends for every
firm. Two monitors, Gelhorn says, allow accountants to multitask
— simultaneously running working-paper files and e-mail
or tax software. The presence of two monitors on a desk prevents
a great deal of printing and also allows practitioners to work
with clients when they come into the office. “The payback
is so significant it’s almost a no-brainer.”
Leung
notes, “The survey shows that some members do well with
technology, but others could take the information in the survey
and take it to the next step.”
The MAPP
surveys will undoubtedly help small and mid-sized firms hone
their operations to better focus on these key priorities. According
to Tabone, national surveys will now be part of the profession’s
landscape, with the next round expected to commence this fall.
The CICA and the provincial institutes will be encouraging more
firms to take the time to fill out the questionnaire. (The full
report, available only to participating firms, includes more
detailed results broken down by city/region and firm size. The
surveys are conducted every two years and firms are encouraged
to participate so they can access the detailed reports. Watch
CICA’s website for updates or contact MAPPSurvey@icao.on.ca.)
As Tabone says, “We expect participation in the next round
to jump as more firms recognize the importance of having this
information.”
John Lorinc is a Toronto-based writer |